Fan of the mismatch – Experts debate whether equities as collateral will ever be acceptable

28th September 2017


Tracey Adams of Lombard Risk examines how as beneficial owners face pressure to accept lower quality assets as collateral for their HQLA, should they be accepting equities, or are their concerns about quality warranted?

Summary

As high-quality collateral becomes scarcer, many institutions are concerned by the cost of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA). While some beneficial owners are willing to accept lower quality collateral, others prepare to compete on the quality of collateral they agree to accept. In an environment where collateral scarcity and mobility has become a fundamental concern, clarity and ease of use rank higher—even over cost. Cost will always be an important factor but the values of collateral must remain. This means collateral must be tangible, high-quality, liquid and easy to value. This is critical in maintaining the core principles of Basel III and the US Dodd-Frank Act

To read the full article on Securities Lending Times, click here.

More information on Lombard Risk’s collateral management solution, COLLINE is available online here. 


Permission to reproduce this piece has been kindly granted by Securities Lending Times

ShareShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someone
Inventory Manager COLLINE Connect COLLINE Calcs STP Business Rules Self Service Optimisation MSFTA ETD OTC Clearing REPO SEC Lending ETF Inventory Manager Optimisation Calcs Connect Dashboard